How long will sticks be used to guard millions in our SACCOs?
Kimisagara SACCO |
Friday morning I woke up on horrible news that one saving
Cooperative (SACCO) in Burega sector,
Rulindo district has been robbed and thugs killed one guard, leaving another
seriously injured.
Operations to hunt down suspects began, but the question on
the incidents still haunt my mind.
This is not the first time a SACCO being robbed in that manner, recently the same bank in Kigali was attacked
and its guard was killed.
Frankly speaking, no year can pass without such kind of sad
news on our people’s bank and their poor guards.
So, one may wonder, why always these banks? We don’t hear
such news in BPR, not in Bank of Kigali, Ecobank, or Equity Bank.
These big banks, they are protected by armed guards, with
guns and other means of pr
Countrywide, SACCOs are guarded by security companies, and
Rwanda has numerous such companies. However, one company, ISCO security is the
only one which is allowed to have guns. You will see guards from this company
at any any big bank in Kigali, but hadly will you see them at SACCO.
I don’t know yet why is that only company is allowed to own
guns, while they are not the one to cover the whole country in locations where
security can have a threat.
For me and those we share the same school of thought, no
security company can be excluded from owning guns because sticks are
everywhere, if a guards is taking a stick, do you think a stick is the only big
weapon which an enemy can miss? Do you think someone hire security agent
because he doesn’t know where sticks are? Sticks are cheap, so everyone may
have them but guns are expensive, although they not containing bullets, they
scare many people.
Officials may think of this, every security company before
recruiting, it gives trainings, so if ISCO is the only company which teach how
to shoot, spread the rule to other companies and ask them to use guns at the
place where security can have dangers.
But also this is for SACCO’s managers, why can’t they hire
someone who is competent to protect people’s money? Because someday people will
lose trust on these banks, and drive their money away.
No comments: